A Finnish counterpart to Anthropic’s “Claude for Legal”.
Open-source skills, agents and guardrails that make Claude a sharper, better assistant for Finnish legal professionals. Every feature is built on real-time source-checking, three-tier certainty labelling and a human-in-the-loop review gate.
Statutes and case law are fetched from Finlex and a legal-source MCP (oik.ai or laki.ai). Every statute number in the repo is verified against the source before release.
Verified · To be checked · Do not use — every citation and calculation carries its certainty label on its own line.
Every skill states what it does NOT do: no cartel help, no destroying evidence, no invented statutes, no covering up crime.
Every output is a draft. A qualified human checks, decides and bears responsibility — the tool speeds up review, it does not replace it.
Legal language, legal research, document review, matter intake, Finnish-language checks, a house-style profile, plus a plain-language explainer and case-law summariser.
Drafting with a clause library and a green/yellow/red risk pass; deviations from house policy.
Governance and the two-pronged distribution test, shareholder agreements, M&A and due diligence.
Restrictive practices, merger control, compliance and dawn-raid readiness.
Finance agreements and collateral, anti-money-laundering, securities markets.
Trademarks and trade names, copyright with the DSM reform, trade secrets.
Tax procedure and appeals, business taxation, VAT.
Choosing the procedure, bankruptcy from creditor and debtor sides, debt collection and enforcement.
Prenups and division of property, child custody and maintenance, inheritance, wills and the forced share, plus guardianship. The child’s best interest and safety first.
Consumer-sale defect liability, distance selling and withdrawal, consumer disputes and fair debt collection. Mandatory in the consumer’s favour.
Employment contracts, termination risk grading, co-operation and change negotiations.
Work-based residence permits, the employer’s verification duty, EU and family-based residence.
Statement of claim, evidence, appeals and the general doctrine of damages.
Pre-trial investigation and coercive measures, charge and defence, the injured party’s claims.
Substantive criminal law: the basis of criminal liability, offence types and sentencing. Defence and injured-party perspective.
Administrative decisions, appeals, transparency and information requests — secrecy assessment as an agent.
Planning and procedures, the invitation to tender and the tender on both sides, appeals to the Market Court.
The legislative-drafting guide, HE drafting instructions, the process guide and legal language — with verified enacting clauses.
A statement on a bill via a 7-step workflow, with impact assessment.
Processing assessment and DPIA, privacy notices, data-subject requests, plus PII Shield anonymisation.
AI Act risk classification, obligations by role, deadlines and FRIA — a deterministic MCP.
Translating legal language with established terms from official sources, plus language rights and authority obligations.
Real-estate and apartment sales with defects, housing companies, leases.
Environmental permits and supervision, land use and the new building permit, environmental liability and DD.
Assumes every citation is wrong until the source proves otherwise. Returns a verification table with fix suggestions — run it on every document that goes out.
Scans every deadline in the material, calculates them on the cautious principle from both possible start dates, and surfaces the most urgent first. Calendar responsibility stays with the human.
A simulator of the other side’s counsel: attacks your brief in earnest and returns a weakness table, your strengths and the top 3 fixes before filing.
Inventories the data room by DD area, produces a gap list ready as an information request and red flags for prioritisation. An inventory — not a legal assessment.
Compares a draft against house risk policy clause by clause and points out what to escalate. Stops if there is no yardstick — it does not invent “market practice”.
Prepares a transparency assessment point by point with statutory grounds and produces a redaction proposal. Partial disclosure as the rule; the official decides.